Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts

Friday, May 8, 2026

On Being Lightly Observed


Being lightly observed not hidden, not fully illuminated

Big Time Not


When I started blogging in 2007, I entertained the same quiet fantasy many people do when they first begin publishing things online: that somehow I might become known. Not famous exactly but discovered by cool people. Maybe not read widely, but passed around among those that matter.

The early days of blogging encouraged this kind of thinking. The web still felt open and full of possibilities. (Boy does that sound like an old person ranting or what?) People linked to one another. Search engines felt democratic such that you could convince yourself that if you kept writing thoughtful things, eventually the audience would arrive.

So, I wrote. A lot.

Travel posts. Language observations. Museum visits. Notes about hikes, signs, maps, software projects, organizational systems, food, language, travel tips and all manner of sundry subjects. Over time, the blog became less a publication and more of an accumulation. A long trail of things that caught my attention strongly enough that I wanted to pin them down in words.

Eventually reality arrived, gently and without much drama: most readers came through search queries. Someone wondering about a mural in Seattle. Someone researching a museum in Florence. Someone trying to understand a hike we did. The audience was niche, fragmented, and almost always accidental.

The comments were sparse but meaningful. Every once in a while, someone would write to say a post resonated with them or helped them see something differently. Those comments meant disproportionately more because they were rare and specific. Someone had not merely landed on the page—they had actually read it.

Somewhere along the way I realized something else: the fantasy of becoming “known” had quietly faded. Not because I failed exactly, but because the work itself had changed function. The writing stopped being an attempt to enter the culture and became a way of narrating my own life. And I’ve come to realize that feels better.

I can imagine what it would be like to be widely observed. Who hasn’t imagined that at some point? But I also understand the cost. Visibility has consequences. It can harden experimentation into persona. It can turn curiosity into brand maintenance.

Meanwhile, obscurity, or partial obscurity, leaves room to wander. There is freedom in being lightly observed.

Unexpected Conclusion


The unexpected conclusion after years of blogging was this: making things becomes much more enjoyable once you stop imagining an audience large enough to validate them. And more accurately: once validation stops being the engine, what remains is curiosity.

You can write exactly the strange thing you want to write. A post about Italian impersonal grammar constructions. A meditation on clutter and organizational entropy. Thoughts about navigation systems south of Milan. Notes on politeness in Japan. Posts celebrating album cover artwork. Long reflections on a personal Scrapbook system that accidentally begins behaving like a tiny science-fiction memory companion.

None of these are market-tested ideas. They tickle our curiosity. Our writing no longer feels like output aimed outward toward “the culture.” It feels more like connective tissue. A way of arranging experience into patterns that make sense later. Especially now, in a world overflowing with expression.

Today, words, music, and images are everywhere. There is infinite commentary layered atop infinite commentary. Entire ecosystems are devoted to producing more content than any human could ever absorb. So, what does it mean to make anything inside this abundance? To release an album, publish a book, make a film, or maintain a long-running written project once required passing through gates. Now nearly everyone can pass through these gates instantly and continuously. The result is both wonderful and overwhelming.

And yet people still make things.

Not always because the world is waiting for them. Often because creating itself is a form of noticing. A way of orienting oneself. A method for stitching together places, conversations, moods, disappointments, jokes, weather, signs, meals, and passing thoughts into something that resembles continuity.

Luck plays a role in who becomes visible and who remains obscure. Sometimes the line between “unobserved” and “observed” feels absurdly thin. Timing. Algorithms. Connections. Cultural mood. Accident.

But there is another truth too: some people truly dedicate themselves to mastery for years or decades. There are artists, musicians, filmmakers, and writers whose visibility is not merely luck but the result of enormous discipline and deep study. The gap between amateur curiosity and practiced craft can be vast and fully earned.

I admire that but at the same time, I no longer feel compelled to measure my own work against those scales. The act of creating serves a different function for me now. It is less about arrival and more about continuation.

Let There Be Music


Recently I added music to the mix. Or perhaps better to say: musical blogging. That’s because it's how I think of the songs, connected to the writing rather than separate from it. They inhabit a similar emotional center for me: weather systems, static, memory, motion, transmissions, fragments, recurring imagery, private references. There is crosstalk between songs and posts.

What surprised me was how quickly music repeated a lesson I had already learned through writing. People often react more to the fact that you make music than to the music itself.

“Oh, you’re making songs now.”

The category arrives before the engagement. And I think I understand why. Modern attention tends toward classification. We absorb labels quickly because there is too much to absorb deeply. Am I a musician, writer, photographer, traveler, content creator, or what? We sort one another into recognizable containers almost instantly to keep ourselves sane.

But categorization is not the same thing as attention. Listening carefully is rare. Reading carefully is rare. Both probably always have been.

And maybe that is what caught me off guard again when I started sharing songs. Music feels strangely vulnerable because it asks for a sustained presence. A song says, stay here with this for four minutes. Enter this atmosphere. Listen closely enough to notice the texture and intent, ...and...most people understandably do not.

Even friends often engage lightly. They acknowledge the existence of the thing rather than inhabiting it. The reaction becomes social instead of immersive.

But then there are exceptions. My companion. A few close friends. The rare people who actually listen. Who notice lyrics, recurring phrases, references to older posts, emotional callbacks, certain sounds or moods that connect to conversations we had years ago. And with those few people, the work becomes something else entirely. It becomes sort of an inside joke, a secret language.

It becomes a shared archive of references accumulated slowly over time, where lyrics recall a trip, a phrase recalls an old argument or a song title recalls a rough spot in the year. Certain themes keep returning often enough that they become sort of a personal mythology. And at this point, I realized that this tiny audience might actually be enough.

Still Transmitting


Maybe that’s what all the writing and music making has become: a running commentary on a life lived. Not content. Not branding. Not a bid for recognition.

It’s a private cinematic universe for an audience of a few people. A secret language built over years of trips, jokes, references, observations, signs, songs, software projects, maps, museums, and repeated phrases.

The blog posts, photographs, notes, and songs now feel less like separate outputs and more like one long interconnected system. The work talks to itself over the years. Certain emotional frequencies repeat (noise). Certain imagery keeps resurfacing (graffiti). Certain obsessions refuse to leave (language).

I’m writing the script and now composing the soundtrack of my life and those close to me, whether they want it or not. And perhaps the most surprising part is that being lightly observed may be exactly what allows it to continue. There is enough audience for resonance but not enough scrutiny to calcify into performance. There is enough attention to feel heard occasionally. There is enough obscurity to remain curious.

And when careful attention does appear, from the small handful of people who truly read and listen closely, it matters enormously precisely because it is rare.

Maybe careful attention has always been rare. Which, annoyingly, is probably why it matters so much when it shows up.

A small signal continuing quietly inside the noise


Friday, February 27, 2026

Late Transmissions

Late Transmissions: How AI (and good software engineering) surprised and delighted me.


Catalyst


The catalyst was an innocuous New Year's message we received from a friend. It was a short, fantastical AI-generated video that was uncanny and oddly charming. Watching it, we started wondering about the soundtrack. Was the music AI-generated too? Or was it stock audio stitched in afterward? We never quite answered the question, but it started us down the research path where we discovered tools that can be used for song generation.

We already knew that AI tools for music existed. A family member had even created a full album of country songs using them. We found it impressive, it didn’t spark any urgency in us to try it ourselves. That changed when we realized that some of these tools weren’t just about generating music from scratch. They allowed you to upload your own audio.

That’s when a light bulb went on. Somewhere in cloud storage sat a folder I rarely opened, filled with forgotten work: rough recordings with and without vocals, incomplete takes, old .wav files paired with scanned lyric sheets. Songs that had been written quickly, recorded imperfectly, and then set aside. The digital artifacts were from 30 years ago and suddenly had more currency.

The question wasn’t whether AI could write new songs. It was simpler and more personal: what would happen if I fed these old original-composition songs back into a new system? Would anything recognizable come back? Would it be interesting? Or would it flatten everything into something generic?

Experiment


After a bit of fiddling around, I tried my first test using Suno AI. The results were immediately pleasing and brought a smile to our faces. The tool didn’t feel like it was replacing the songs so much as re-voicing them in interesting ways. (In fact, in Suno it’s called a cover.) With some guidance in prompts and settings, the output came back remarkably close to what I remember wanting to do thirty years ago but couldn’t quite execute at the time. It was thrilling not because it was perfect, but because it felt like I was completing something left unfinished.

I think of these new versions as drafts that are an order of magnitude better than the originals. They’re not finished songs, and perhaps I don’t really want them to be. They aren’t finished because the AI process can introduce noise and artifacts into the final output. These can be removed in remastering Suno output (stems). We didn't go that far for our first attempt because we didn’t know how. And even with the noise and artifacts in our final songs, we were happy.

My preference for these songs is for real people to perform them someday. Or is that idea anachronistic? At least now these drafts can properly communicate the idea, the mood, the structure I had in mind. That, to me, is magic: not automation, but translation.

Expression


During the rediscovery and reimagining of these songs, I came around to the idea that songs function for me much like blog posts. They are audio blog posts. (Yeah, I know that much of the world has moved on from longer-form writing like blogs, but I haven’t.) Blog posts—and now songs—are formats in which I can express my thoughts or feelings.

Some of the messages from thirty years ago survived surprisingly well. Others needed a small amount of tuning, though I resisted changing the lyrics more than necessary for this first try. I wanted to hear what that earlier voice was actually saying, not rewrite it from the comfort of hindsight.

I was surprised at how many of the themes addressed in the songs are still relevant to me today: my voice, my sense of freedom, and ability to deal with modern life. In short, timeless themes.

In that sense, reinterpreting of these songs isn’t about reviving the past so much as finishing a sentence or blog post.

Release


Using AI in the process wasn’t about polishing or correcting the past, but about filtering it. It acted like a lens, separating signal from static, letting certain ideas come through more clearly than they ever had before. The result isn’t a set of finished songs so much as clearer drafts, and that feels right for now. Releasing them now isn’t a performance or a bid for attention; it’s simply a form of publication. It’s much easier to send a link than a batch of files. Publishing lets these transmissions complete their journey so I can move on to the next phase.

This post—and the album that shares its name—are both called Late Transmissions (Spotify, Apple, YouTube). The title felt unavoidable. These songs were written long ago, partially broadcast, and then abandoned mid-signal. They’re late not because they were delayed on purpose, but because they took a long route to their current form. 

Monday, April 21, 2025

On Writing and Shadows

 
"Austerlitz" by W.G. Sebald and "In Praise of Shadows" by Jun'ichirō Tanizaki.

I recently finished the novel Austerlitz, a 2001 novel by W.G. Sebald. About two thirds through the book, we find Austerlitz holed up in his very gray London flat – a flat stripped of color and containing only the bare necessities for furniture. He is at an existential impasse reconciling a past that refuses to be captured in words. The tension is between the desire to record memory and the failing of words to fully do so. These quotes about writing from that part of the book resonated with me:
“Now and then a train of thought did succeed in emerging with wonderful clarity inside my head, but I knew even as it formed that I was in no position to record it, for as soon as I so much as picked up my pencil the endless possibilities of language, to which I could once safely abandon myself, became a conglomeration of the most inane phrases.”

“All I could think was that such a sentence only appears to mean something, but in truth is at best a makeshift expedient, a kind of unhealthy growth issuing from our ignorance, something which we use, in the same way as many sea plants and animals use their tentacles, to grope blindly through the darkness enveloping us.”

“However much or little I had written, on a subsequent reading it always seemed so fundamentally flawed that I had to destroy it immediately and begin again. Soon I could not even venture on the first step.”

(Maybe I should heed the advice on that last quote?)

Austerlitz's home in London is described as on Alderney Road (near Mile End Junction), near the Alderney Road Cemetery, Mile End – Ashkanz. I went on Google Maps street view to try and at least imagine the flat from the outside.

The “out-of-time" nature of Austerlitz’s flat, as I imagined it, intrigued me. It reminded me of a quote from the 1933 essay In Praise of Shadows, by the Japanese author Jun'ichirō Tanizaki.

"Have you ever felt a sort of fear in the face of the ageless, a fear that in that room you might lose all consciousness of the passage of time, that untold years might pass and upon emerging you should find that you had grown old and gray?"

That quote appears in section 9, with the title “An uncanny silence”, sectioning as given by Wikipedia page. I imagine Austerlitz’s house would be like this.

The essay lays out Tanizaki’s (and by extension the Japanese) aesthetic and as you might guess from the title, it has to do with shadows. Friends gifted us the book to get ready for an upcoming trip to Japan. We will be searching for those shadows and a glimpse of Austerlitz.